International / Cross-Border Tax Consulting
Service description
Cross-border tax consulting plans the tax side of a business decision before it happens — choosing an entity structure for a new foreign subsidiary or U.S. entity, deciding whether to check the box on a foreign entity's classification, applying an income tax treaty, and structuring how profits move between the U.S. and foreign operations. It's a scoping and structuring engagement rather than a return-preparation one, done ahead of expansion, an acquisition, or bringing foreign owners or operations into the U.S.
Common industries
Any business, in any industry, expanding abroad or bringing foreign operations or ownership into the U.S.
ROI
Early structuring avoids double taxation and costly restructuring later; bespoke, so it's a scoping conversation more than a fixed quote.
Benefit
Plan the tax side of expanding abroad or bringing foreign operations/owners into the U.S. — entity choice, treaties, repatriation.
Why get it
The entity classification and structure chosen at the outset of a cross-border move shapes which country taxes what, and unwinding the wrong choice later is far more expensive than getting it right at the start.
When you benefit
A one-time or project-based engagement tied to a specific expansion, acquisition, or restructuring, rather than a recurring annual filing.
What it costs
Typically a project fee or hourly engagement, scoped to the structure's complexity and the number of jurisdictions involved.
When you pay
Commonly billed in phases as the engagement progresses — initial structuring analysis, then documentation as entities are formed or elections filed — or as a fixed project fee agreed before work starts.
Other costs
Foreign legal counsel to form entities, and filing fees in the foreign jurisdiction itself, are separate from the U.S. tax structuring fee.
Risks to know
A check-the-box election, once made, generally can't be changed again for 60 months, so a structure chosen without enough analysis can be stuck in place well past when it stops fitting the business. Missing a treaty position or an entity election deadline can mean paying tax in both countries with no credit or relief available for the gap.
When risks arise
Entity classification and structural elections are locked in near the start of the cross-border move and are hard to unwind afterward, so the highest-leverage window is before the first foreign entity is formed or the first foreign owner is added. A treaty position not properly claimed usually surfaces only when a foreign tax authority or the IRS reviews the return.
The process
The consultant reviews the planned transaction or expansion and the entities involved, and analyzes the available structures against the U.S. rules and any applicable tax treaty. It recommends an entity classification and, where useful, prepares the election, and works with foreign counsel to align the U.S. structure with the foreign-country filing. The business reviews and approves the structure before the first entity is formed or the transaction closes.
Your commitment
The business shares its expansion or transaction plans, the entities and ownership involved on both sides of the border, and the countries in play. It should flag the target timeline early, since entity elections and treaty positions generally need to be in place before the transaction, not after.
Documents to gather
- Description of the planned expansion, acquisition, or restructuring
- Ownership chart showing entities on both sides of the border
- Countries involved and any existing foreign registrations
- Prior entity-classification elections (Form 8832), if any
Helpful reading
- The basic framework of cross-border taxation — Journal of Accountancy
- Check-the-box effects for foreign owners — The Tax Adviser
Further research
Not open yet
International / Cross-Border Tax Consulting isn’t taking requests yet. Join the waitlist. It is listed in your requests tray.